Jump to content

Amodel Myasischev M-50 Bounder


Recommended Posts

I have just put the finishing touches to my Amodel M-50 Bounder.

I decided to paint it in the grey-and-white colour scheme it wore for the 1961 Tushino flypast - I have enough NM Russian bombers in my collection already....

It is very difficult to photograph, being so long...... :thumbsup:

m-50_022.jpg

I also elected to incorporate the kit option of having the ejection seats lowered - to add a bit of interest.

m-50_023.jpg

I should really make a couple of long access ladders.....

I put a crew figure alongside to lend scale..

m-50_024.jpg

Closeup of the ejection seats...

m-50_027.jpg

A few more photos - plus the early build - at :- http://www.flankers-site.co.uk/modl_m-50.html

Ken

Link to post
Share on other sites
Nice looking model. Forgive my ignorance, but does the forward oleo compress to allow the crew to get into the seats? Or do they actually have to climb up a ladder to hop into a seat hanging 20 feet in the air???

The Russians made a special gantry type ladder for the crew to use, it was wheeled under the seats

Ken

Link to post
Share on other sites
Nice looking model. Forgive my ignorance, but does the forward oleo compress to allow the crew to get into the seats? Or do they actually have to climb up a ladder to hop into a seat hanging 20 feet in the air???

Same thing I was thinking... seems more dangerous to board the plane than to fly it... :)

Link to post
Share on other sites
Same thing I was thinking... seems more dangerous to board the plane than to fly it... :)

That's what I thought too, but on the other hand the whole aircraft looks like it was some rip-off from "Thunderbirds" and thus just doesn't look like it was aerodynamically functional in the real world - as it basically wasn't.

Nevertheless, a beautiful model!

Link to post
Share on other sites
Wow ! I would have loved to build that kit but I don't have enough room. You rarely do washes on your models Ken don't you ?

I don't - or rather can't - do washes Laurent.

Apart from not being able to execute it properly, I always feel that panel lines are almost always overdone on the finished models I have seen.

Looking at a model from a foot away is like looking at the real thing from 72 feet away - and you can't see panel lines on a real aircraft at that distance.

Still, I admire those who can apply some subtle shading - as long as it's not overdone.

I have not 'washed' mine - but I have applied a few streaks and highlights with pastels.

I feel it's a bit overdone on my model - after all it is supposed to be in a pristine condition for the Tushino flypast but I was in a bit of a hurry to get it finished for the IPMS UK Scale Modelworld in November.

I build my models to be part of a display collection of Soviet/Russian aircraft, rather than being superdetailed masterpieces.

That's my excuse anyway.............. :)

Ken

Link to post
Share on other sites
Nice looking model. Forgive my ignorance, but does the forward oleo compress to allow the crew to get into the seats? Or do they actually have to climb up a ladder to hop into a seat hanging 20 feet in the air???

See my pics of the ladders.

Re the front oleo - the opposite is actually the case.....

The front bogie pivots about the axle - and the front two wheels are raised off the ground - thereby increasing the height.

This is done to increase the angle of attack for takeoff.

Ken

Link to post
Share on other sites
That's what I thought too, but on the other hand the whole aircraft looks like it was some rip-off from "Thunderbirds" and thus just doesn't look like it was aerodynamically functional in the real world - as it basically wasn't.

Nevertheless, a beautiful model!

That's a bit unfair Janman..........

While it only just made Mach 1 (at least according to some reports) it made only 19 flights before being cancelled and the Myasischev OKB closed down - Kruschev was only interested in ICBM's.

It was never fitted with its intended engines, so its potential was never tested fully.

Don't forget, it was the Myasischev OKB that created the design that led to the Tu-160 - after it had been handed over to Tupolev.

Ken

Link to post
Share on other sites
<...>thus just doesn't look like it was aerodynamically functional in the real world - as it basically wasn't.

It wasn't? ;) Wikipedia only says something about "an outstanding failure which revealed an embarrassing lack of understanding of the problems of high-speed flight."

While on the subject, you've seen the "Chad Vader: Dayshift Manager" stuff on YouTube..?

Why, yes, of course. :)

Some more funny stuff:

But the BEST OF 'EM ALL: Robot Chicken Star Wars!

Ah, damn, can't find a working link for those right now. Google 'em, definitely worth the search.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...