Jump to content

MQ-9 Reaper - retracted landing gear


Recommended Posts

I have built the Bronco 1:48 MQ-1 Predator, and hopefully my Skunk Models 1:48 MQ-9 Reaper kit will arrive soon.

I am considering building the Reaper "in flight" with the landing gear retracted.

However, does anyone have good pics of a Reaper (or even a Predator) with clear shots of the gear retracted?

Thanks in advance...

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 months later...

I am currently building the 1/48 Skunkmodels MQ-9 Reaper... and I am boggled by the dimensions of it compared to the 1/48 Bronco RQ/MQ-1 Predator.

This morning I took pics of them side by side to show the difference in dimensions between the two. I had thought that the Reaper shared the same basic airframe as the Predator, so I was shocked so see such a noticeable difference in dimensions. I thought someone had made huge errors in the kits.

Check out how massive the MQ-9 Reaper is compared to the Predator... fuselage length & width, fuselage shape (flat on top not rounded like Predator), wingspan, wing chord at the root (double that of Predator), and under-chin sensor dome (several times the size of the Predator's).

Mind you, if you go to wikipedia and compare the major specifications it seems plausible. The Reaper dimensions seem 20~30% bigger on most major dimensions, it has a much bigger stronger engine and load capacity.

IMG_3156.JPG

IMG_3157.JPG

IMG_3158.JPG

IMG_3159.JPG

Edited by GlennCauley
Link to post
Share on other sites

Totally different airframe. Got a chance to be less than 50' from a Reaper taxiing out for a mission once. It's a pretty good-sized machine. Seemed like it was about the length of an F-16. The Global Hawk is is BIG - like U-2 sized big.

Edited by TXCajun
Link to post
Share on other sites

I am currently building the 1/48 Skunkmodels MQ-9 Reaper... and I am boggled by the dimensions of it compared to the 1/48 Bronco RQ/MQ-1 Predator.

This morning I took pics of them side by side to show the difference in dimensions between the two. I had thought that the Reaper shared the same basic airframe as the Predator, so I was shocked so see such a noticeable difference in dimensions. I thought someone had made huge errors in the kits.

Check out how massive the MQ-9 Reaper is compared to the Predator... fuselage length & width, fuselage shape (flat on top not rounded like Predator), wingspan, wing chord at the root (double that of Predator), and under-chin sensor dome (several times the size of the Predator's).

Mind you, if you go to wikipedia and compare the major specifications it seems plausible. The Reaper dimensions seem 20~30% bigger on most major dimensions, it has a much bigger stronger engine and load capacity.

Great inspirational build for the upcoming UAV GB July 1st.......

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another question about the main landing gear...

Do both L & R main gear legs retract at the same time ; is there one retraction mechanism that connects to both ?

Or do they retract independently of each other?

I'm thinking it is most likely there is a single retraction mechanism that retracts both gear legs at the same time... but thought I'd ask. :)

Why do I ask? If I'm modelling a Reaper with gear in mid-retract, I wanted to know if the gear is retracted the same on both sides or if they could be slightly different.

Edited by GlennCauley
Link to post
Share on other sites

Another question about the main landing gear...

Do both L & R main gear legs retract at the same time ; is there one retraction mechanism that connects to both ?

Or do they retract independently of each other?

I'm thinking it is most likely there is a single retraction mechanism that retracts both gear legs at the same time... but thought I'd ask. :)

Why do I ask? If I'm modelling a Reaper with gear in mid-retract, I wanted to know if the gear is retracted the same on both sides or if they could be slightly different.

Each gear strut has an individual electric actuator. They pretty much retract together, but there can be differences in the actuators, so there can be some split in relative position. The gear is very slow on Predator/Reapers. Something like 30 seconds to complete a cycle.

One thing to note: the skin around the main gear wells is recessed. You can kind of see it in the Ikhana picture. Skunk missed this on their kit (and their main gear wells are total fantasy...). Whether this is important to correct is up to you. I'll post some detail pics later (I don't have the camera card with them on it with me.)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, here are a couple close up shots of the gear well area of an MQ-9:

P1000825.jpg

P1000826.jpg

You can see the recessed area on the fuselage around the gear wells that Skunk missed. It also gives you some idea of what the wells are actually shaped like. The first photo also shows the pressure refueling port, which Skunk also missed. The second give some idea what the retraction system looks like. I may have been a bit misleading on my last reply. The mains have a single actuator, while the nose has a separate actuator. So the mains will come up together.

The whole gear assembly on the Skunk kit is a bit simplified, but the basic shapes are there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...