Jump to content

Wellington 1C 20 OTU Markings


Recommended Posts

I recently picked up (another) 1/48 Wellington (couldn't resist the low price) and was looking around for possible RCAF markings when I came across this article .

The Wellington was with 20 OTU and had codes JM D however I can't seem to find any reference photos of what the aircraft marking colours were - I am boldly assuming it was painted in standard Dark Earth/Dark Green over Black with typical yellow surround RAF roundels on the sides an regular blue/Red on top, however the Sqn. lettering / serial # could have been grey or red - I'm leaning toward red as the aircraft crashed in January 1942 and I think the codes were red by this time.

Can anyone help me out with what this A/C may have looked like? - or feel free to point out another RCAF Wellington 1C example to tackle instead.

I had better luck finding reference for my Mk. III in RCAF markings.

Thanks in advance - Happy modelling

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

I recently picked up (another) 1/48 Wellington (couldn't resist the low price) and was looking around for possible RCAF markings when I came across this article .

The Wellington was with 20 OTU and had codes JM D however I can't seem to find any reference photos of what the aircraft marking colours were - I am boldly assuming it was painted in standard Dark Earth/Dark Green over Black with typical yellow surround RAF roundels on the sides an regular blue/Red on top, however the Sqn. lettering / serial # could have been grey or red - I'm leaning toward red as the aircraft crashed in January 1942 and I think the codes were red by this time.

Can anyone help me out with what this A/C may have looked like? - or feel free to point out another RCAF Wellington 1C example to tackle instead.

I had better luck finding reference for my Mk. III in RCAF markings.

Thanks in advance - Happy modelling

David

David,

I have a bunch of reference material on the Wellington-I'll see what I can come up with regarding the OTU A/C, but typically most books usually only have pics of operational aircraft. As regards an RCAF IC-you only have one option, and that is 419. While several RCAF Squadons flew the Wellington, and more than one type, 419 was the only squadron to use the IC.

Cheers,

Tom

Edited by Tom
Link to post
Share on other sites

Tom,

I had beenon a 419 Sqn. website (as well as lots of other sites) to do a few hours of research and after spending a few more hours (my how timeflies) I think I've found another excellent subject.

419 Sqn. Wellington 1c Z1145 VRoA. However, I only have reference photos of what appear to be Mk.III aircraft from 419 Sqn. (lots of pictures of Q and one of A) and may have to make the assumption that thiswas the marked similarly..?

Sad but interesting note: Canadian crewmember (Fl/Eng: P/O. Thomas George Cottier J/4885 R.C.A.F. 27) who was involvedin the crash of Z1145 (KIA) had survived a previous crash of Wellington1c X9747HAoE.

I also found the back story on the Wellington Mk. III (x3763 KWoL from 425 Sqn.) lost on a mission to Stuttgart that I have planned as well. So at least one RCAF Wellington should get completed next year. salute.gif

Thanks for the help,

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tom,

Appreciate the attempt. I've got some time before I get to the paint and markings stage so if I don't come up with any reference photos I'll go with what I believe it looked like based on other aircraft that I do have photos of. The RAF kept a pretty tight reign on things so likely it wouldn't stray too far from factory standards.

Going with - 419 Sqn. Wellington 1c Z1145 VRoA. and 425 Sqn. KWoL for the Mk. III.

The Trumpeter kit looks really good so far (I don't know what all the whining was about the "overdone" geodetic surface as it seems about right to me... maybe they hadn't seen too many photos of a Whimpy as I have several that clearly show the effect across the surfaces.

Cheers,

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...